|




|
|

EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
Share

Brag Bowling
|
Brag is a native Virginian who grew up in Arlington. He graduated from the University of
Richmond with a BA in History and also has a JD Degree from the University of Richmond Law School. He served as a First Lieutenant in the US Army
for two years. He worked as a staff attorney in the Virginia General Assembly for 5 years before changing careers and going into real estate,
which is his present occupation. He has served the Sons of Confederate Veterans in a variety of positions including Commander of the Virginia
Division and Adjutant-in-Chief for the national SCV. He is the director of the Stephen D. Lee Institute.
|
How did the Northern newspapers treat the news of South Carolina's secession?
Commentary by Bragdon Bowling, 1/20/2011
"If it [Jefferson's words in the Declaration of Independence] justified the secession from the British Empire of three millions of Colonists in
1776, we do not see why it would not justify the secession of five millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861."
---Horace Greeley, New York Tribune, Dec. 24, 1860 (PDF format).
On December 20, 1860, the State of South Carolina formally seceded from the Union. South Carolina was the first of a group of Southern states to
leave. The world watched as this act took place and newspapers everywhere had much to say about it.
Editorials in both the North and South represented all shades of political, economic and religious opinion. They ran the gamut from outright
condemnation and threats to general agreement that the South Carolina Secession Convention had done the legal and constitutionally permissible thing.
The press of New York City was divided in their opinions. For example, Horace Greeley and the New York Herald while lamenting the situation felt
that South Carolina had the constitutional right to secede. He famously said “Godspeed” and “let them go”. The New York Daily News suggested that
New York City secede with South Carolina and form an independent free trade commerce center to take advantage of the changing economy. The New
York Tribune suggested that the incoming Lincoln Administration be “statesmanlike” and make whatever compromises which were necessary in order to
keep the Union together. The New York Times put a unique spin on the issue by stating that Mexico could be annexed as a protectorate to make up
for the loss of the Southern states.
Outside of New York, typical of many Northern newspapers was the newspaper in Lincoln’s hometown, The Springfield Illinois Daily State Journal
which called for retribution on the South. Stating the Union to be indissoluble and that secession was treason, the paper criticized President
Buchanan for doing nothing with the situation and stated that if need be, the seceding states should be brought back into the Union by force of
arms. In Washington D.C., the Washington States and Union paper addressed secession by maintaining that a state cannot be coerced into remaining
in the Union and that statehood was voluntary and South Carolina had a perfect right to secede.
From a uniquely Southern perspective, Edward A. Pollard, editor of the Richmond Examiner, noted that he felt that South Carolina’s withdrawal
was generally treated with derision by northern newspapers. Cartoons mocked Southern chivalry, manners and valor. The press mocked secession,
insolently feeling that the South lacked the military might to pull off the feat. When it became apparent that the South was more than just bluster,
the tone of the editorials later changed to a desire for revenge and punishment.
Certainly South Carolina’s departure helped galvanize public opinion in both the North and South. Suppression of the free press became a
Lincolnian mantra. Once the Lincoln Administration came into office, it became very obvious that dissent from the press would not be tolerated.
The government removed anti –government and anti-war newspapers from the mail, confiscated newspapers and news print equipment, censored
telegraphic messages and arrested editors and publishers. By the end of the war, over 300 papers had been closed and over 14,000 people were
placed in jail without the writ of habeas corpus.
Published Jan. 18, 2011 in the Washington Post blog.
"I love the Union and the Constitution, but I would rather leave the Union with the Constitution than remain in the Union without it"
-- Jefferson Davis
"The principle for which we contend is bound to reassert itself, though it may be at another time and in another form."
-- Jefferson Davis
Brag is a native Virginian who grew up in Arlington. He graduated from the University of
Richmond with a BA in History and also has a JD Degree from the University of Richmond Law School. He served as a First Lieutenant in the US Army
for two years. He worked as a staff attorney in the Virginia General Assembly for 5 years before changing careers and going into real estate,
which is his present occupation. He has served the Sons of Confederate Veterans in a variety of positions including Commander of the Virginia
Division and Adjutant-in-Chief for the International Sons of Confederate Veterans.
View Selected period Editorials below
Like this? SIGN UP now
for weekly email updates in your inbox !!
Contribute now to help us maintain this website and carry on our mission!
Related Links
Did the seceding states believe they could leave peacefully without provoking a war? - by Brag Bowling
How did the Northern newspapers treat the news of South Carolina's secession? - by Brag Bowling, Washington Post blog
The Pendulum Swings - Deo Vindice - Commentary by J.A. Davis 3/26/10
Deception, Duplicity and Manipulative Government - Commentary by J.A. Davis 3/12/10
Poisoning History - Guilt-tripping to Utopia - Commentary by Steve Scroggins 3/11/10
Empires: Complexity and Collapse - Commentary by J.A. Davis 3/09/10
Vertical Debt Limit - Steve Scroggins 3/02/10
Worse Than We're Told; Next Election Cycle May Be Too Late - Commentary by J.A. Davis 2/27/10
Empire or Liberty? - Steve Scroggins 2/26/10
What is States' Rights? - Part 2 - Mike Crane 2/24/10
Washington's Integrity - Steve Scroggins 2/22/10
Voting Rights, Responsibilities (Part 2) - Steve Scroggins 2/19/10
Defending Truth is Doing One's Duty - J.A. Davis 1/31/10
A Troubled New Year - J.A. Davis 12/31/09
A Fine Mess - J.A. Davis 12/11/09
Liberty Lost Part 9 - Rebirth of the Republic - J.A. Davis
SPLC Reputation as Frauds and Conmen Grows - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Perils of Democracy, Part 5 - J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins
Black History Month and 'Civil War Memory' - Bill Vallante 2/01/10
Lincoln Hypocrisy - Steve Scroggins 3/18/07
The Death of Robert E. Lee - Calvin E. Johnson, Jr. 10/08/09
The John B. Gordon Story - Calvin E. Johnson, Jr. 1/30/10
Climate Fraud Shows Government is the Problem - Frank Gillispie, 12/03/09
Climategate is a symptom, not the disease - Jim Dean, 12/2/09
The American Ideal of 1776: The Twelve Basic American Principles - Hamilton Abert Long
Liberty Lost - Part 8 - J.A. Davis
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
Share
Editorials from Northern Newspapers
Many newspapers favored allowing the southern states to peacefully leave as the one below by Greeley.
But later in February and March of 1861, the sentiments changed...
"If the Declaration of Independence justified the secession of 3,000,000 colonists in 1776, I do not see why the Constitution ratified by the same
men should not justify the secession of 5,000,000 of the Southerners from the Federal Union in 1861...
We have repeatedly said, and we once more insist that the great principle embodied by Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence that government
derives its power from the consent of the governed is sound and just, then if the Cotton States, the Gulf States or any other States choose to form
an independent nation they have a clear right to do it...
The right to secede may be a revolutionary one, but it exists nevertheless; and we do not see how one party can have a right to do what another
party has a right to prevent. We must ever resist the asserted right of any State to remain in the Union and nullify or defy the laws thereof;
to withdraw from the Union is another matter. And when a section of our Union resolves to go out, we shall resist any coercive acts to keep
it in. We hope never to live in a Republic where one section is pinned to the other section by bayonets ." --Horace Greeley, New York Tribune
[ full editorial 12/17/1860 ]
"The predicament in which both the Government and the commerce of the country are placed, through the non-enforcement of our revenue laws,
is now thoroughly understood the world over....If the manufacturer at Manchester [England] can send his goods into the Western States
through New Orleans at less cost than through New York, he is a fool for not availing himself of his advantage...If the importations of
the counrty are made through Southern ports, its exports will go through the same channel. The produce of the West, instead of coming to
our own port by millions of tons, to be transported abroad by the same ships through which we received our importations, will seek other
routes and other outlets. With the lost of our foreign trade, what is to become of our public works, conducted at the cost of many huindred
millions of dollars, to turn into our harbor the products of the interior? They share in the common ruin. So do our manufacturers...Once
at New Orleans, goods may be distributed over the whole country duty-free. The process is perfectly simple... The commercial bearing of
the question has acted upon the North...We now see clearly whither we are tending, and the policy we must adopt. With us it is no longer
an abstract question---one of Constitutional construction, or of the reserved or delegated powers of the State or Federal government, but
of material existence and moral position both at home and abroad.....We were divided and confused till our pockets were touched."
---New York Times March 30, 1861
"The Southern Confederacy will not employ our ships or buy our goods. What is our shipping without it? Literally nothing....It is very
clear that the South gains by this process, and we lose. No---we MUST NOT "let the South go." "
----Union Democrat , Manchester, NH, February 19, 1861
From a story entitled: "What shall be done for a revenue?"
"That either revenue from duties must be collected in the ports of the rebel states, or the ports must be closed to importations from abroad....
If neither of these things be done, our revenue laws are substantially repealed; the sources which supply our treasury will be dried up; we
shall have no money to carry on the government; the nation will become bankrupt before the next crop of corn is ripe.....Allow rail road iron
to be entered at Savannah with the low duty of ten per cent, which is all that the Southern Confederacy think of laying on imported goods, and
not an ounce more would be imported at New York; the railroads would be supplied from the southern ports.
---New York Evening Post March 12, 1861, recorded in Northern Editorials on Secession, Howard C. Perkins, ed., 1965, pp. 598-599.
|
|
Copyright © 2003-2012, GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org
Georgia Heritage Council | 2121 Hollywood RD
Atlanta, GA 30318 Email:
|



|