|


Jim Dean, Heritage TV producer/host
|
Jim Dean is the producer of Heritage TV and a member of Georgia Heritage Council.
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
|
Major Supreme Court Immigration Victory – Commentary by Jim Dean
Dear legal Americans,
Our corrupt pro-illegal-immigration politicians cooperated in
undermining effective enforcement of the immigration laws. This was just one of the many versions of vote-buying.
They have layers and layers undermining the laws.
For example if the budget for holding captured illegals has
already been spent then local communities have to bare the cost of holding them. If they arrested several
thousand illegals in Atlanta tomorrow, there would be no place to put them...and no one to pay for it.
The Feds have to pay for shipping them back and when they come back, pay again to ship them back. So
after a while they figure...Oh what the hell, let's just pretend...like we do on a lot of the other stuff...
Sheriffs and police chiefs across the country have openly said
they have no interest whatsoever in picking up hordes of illegals. It's kind of like your boss asking to
you work until 9 pm every night and not paying you for it. You'd rather pass.
But the illegals in the below case went to court to protect the
right to illegally immigrate and not to be harassed by immigration enforcement. The word gall
comes to mind. But hey, look at the track record. Maybe Ira Mean felt that with Jorge Bush and
co-presidente Fox would do the deal for him.
Every day we are hearing more and more about a major shift in
the public's attitude on illegal immigration. Maybe...just maybe...deep down...a lot of folks just want
to be vigilantes :-)
Jim Dean is the producer of Heritage TV and a member of the Georgia
Heritage Council.
|
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=19944
Supreme Court Ruling Razes Artificial Fire Wall - Between Local Law and Immigration Enforcement
Posted by FAIR-US on Monday April 4, 2005 at 10:58 am MST
(Washington D.C. - April 1, 2005) In its March 22 ruling in the case of Muehler v. Mena, the Supreme Court removed barriers that prevent local law enforcement officers from questioning the immigration status of individuals they suspect to be in the United States illegally. In this groundbreaking decision, the high Court rejected the claim of Ira Mena, a permanent resident of the U.S., that police had violated the Fourth Amendment while conducting a lawful search of her home.
The Fourth Amendment provides protection by establishing that persons be shielded against unreasonable search and seizure. Mena argued that by questioning her, and the illegal alien detainees about their immigration status during a lawful search, officers violated her Fourth Amendment rights. Mena further claimed that questions asked about her citizenship required officers to have had independent reasonable suspicion regarding the unlawfulness of her immigration status.
Calling a decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals “faulty,” the Supreme Court held that “mere police questioning [regarding one’s immigration status] does not constitute a seizure.” The Court continued its landmark ruling on this issue by stating that “the officers did not need reasonable suspicion to ask Mena for her name, date of birth, or immigration status.”
“Whatever legal fig leaf many police departments have been using to justify policies of non-cooperation with federal immigration authorities, has been stripped away by this landmark Supreme Court decision,” stated Dan Stein, president of FAIR. “If local police are barred from cooperating with federal authorities in the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws it is purely a political decision on the part of local politicians and police chiefs. There is no legal barrier to local police inquiring about a person’s immigration status and then acting upon the information they gather.”
Congress expressly intended for local law enforcement to act in cases in which officers have reason to believe that an individual is in the country illegally, even though immigration law enforcement is not their primary responsibility. In 1996, Congress passed and President Clinton signed legislation that protects individual officers who act to enforce federal immigration laws, even if their departments have non-cooperation policies.
“In Muehler v. Mena the Court reinforced the clear intent of Congress in this matter,” said Stein. “Inquiring about an individual’s immigration status can and should be a routine part of ascertaining information, no different than asking questions about one’s name, or date and place of birth. Local police come into contact with people who are violating federal immigration laws on a daily basis. Freeing local police to inquire about an individual’s immigration status and allowing them to act is essential to curbing mass illegal immigration and protecting our homeland security.”
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=19944
|
The Minute Man Project
Americans doing the job Congress won't do
Frosty Wooldridge
Bush Calls Border Watchers 'Vigilantes' - newsmax.com
OTM's...Other than Mexicans
by Jim Dean
Bush vows to pursue leniency for illegals
Knight-Ridder
Exposing Condi Rice
Frosty Wooldridge
EMAIL THIS
PRINT THIS
Copyright © 2003-2012, GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org
Georgia Heritage Council | 2121 Hollywood RD
Atlanta, GA 30318 Email:
|



|